My Yahoo Size Goes To ∞

Yahoo Mail size goes to infinity

I was hoping to see such a thing from Gmail as they promised I never have to delete an email again. Either that or I will be sending all emails from Gmail to here. Yahoo Mail Beta is really nice I like it, and their web chat is (let’s be honest) way more advanced than Gmail chat. They have come from behind and surpassed Google on web chat and size. I still however find Gmail much more convenient to use and don’t wish to switch back. So this is a call to Gmail to hear the cries.

Wonder if all others have gotyrn the unlimited size storage. I read sometime back it won’t be offered for all. Maybe they just gave it to me cause I’m so much light user right now. Did anyone of you get it? I’m interested in non-paying Yahoo users more.

Popularity: 3% [?]

Most Popular Posts:

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

Comments

Kudos to you for rightly giving Yahoo! the credit it deserves. Seriously, it’s more than I expect from the media – especially the tech media – these days.

The sad thing is that you’re in the absolute minority. Mark my words: six months from now Google will also “introduce” infinite email storage capacity, they won’t do jack with Google Talk, and eWeek, InfoWeek, ComputerWorld, and every other blogger who has ever written a line of HTML will fawn over Sergey and Larry like they’re about to be issued their very own Google Platinum Visa.

The pro-Google bias is, IMO, getting past the point of being merely ridiculous – it’s starting to do a disservice to early adopters, investors, and the general public.

It’s not only

Thanks Jeff for sharing your thoughts. I had a feeling infinite storage is only for the people who won’t reach it. Still, it gives a feel of convenience.

I am a Google addict person I’ll tell you the truth, but there is nothing perfect. I rarely use Yahoo!, Google is doing most what I need and it’s better to have central place for everything (ofcourse risk becomes higher as well). What I loved from Yahoo recently is:

1- Yahoo Mail improvements
2- Yahoo Messenver Pc to Phone service. Google Talk will soon follow them I think. I didn’t like the way they try to push their toolbar and extra stuff
3- Yahoo Answers.

You’re welcome, Bashar.

I have to admit that I am also a fan of several products and services that fall under the Google umbrella.

While I like to think of myself as a Yahoo! enthusiast/cheerleader, I am *hugely* disappointed in the company’s terrible execution of its stated vision for itself, its users, and the Web generally.

Yahoo! is on the brink of blowing the social Web the same way they blew their lead with search a few years back, and the way they more recently squandered the incredible asset they acquired through their purchase of Konfabulator: where’s the integration with MyYahoo?! Where’s the Yahoo! pseudo desktop that a widget for every Yahoo! property could have – and should have – delivered years ago?

Oh, wait – Adobe and Microsoft are fighting for the soul of the Web-integrated desktop through Apollo and Silverlight, respectively, while iGoogle and Netvibes have reduced MyYahoo! to an also-ran.

While Yahoo! only has itself to blame for most of its woes, the myopic focus on Google in popular culture really does worry me. There are *a lot* of great products and services out there from both the established players (Yahoo!, Microsoft, AOL, Ask.com) as well as the start-ups.

Incessant Google-worship (especially from technophiles who should know better) completely drowns all this out, though. Worse, it sets the entire Web up for the same sort of exploitation and stagnation that Microsoft has been so justly chastised for in the past Don’t believe me? Search for “adsense sucks” for the examples of the former, and “Google perpetual beta” or “Google desktop search, Microsoft, sue” for examples of the the latter.

Google works hard to promote their image of being different in a “do no evil” sort of way, but I really don’t see anything coming from the Googleplex to convince me this is anything more than a consistent marketing message.

I’d be very interested in your thoughts on this. :-)

Jeff: It starts to get embarrassing when comments are more thorough than the post itself. Very helpful at the same time :)

First on the note Yahoo have failed to achieve it’s goals, I’m not sure if this is a reason or not, but one thing I like and I think gives power to Google is that they usually don’t just run to clone what people have. They have their own vision and way of doing things. It gives a lot more freedom when you do what you want not what others are doing. Typical opposite example is Microsoft. Which is why it takes soo long until they release a WOW thing.

As for Google and no evil, ask me sometime back I’d say Google are second after angels. I will start first by good examples of no evil from Google:

1- Do not attack competitor. At least not directly. Gates made negative comments about Google in interviews while Ballmer talked to about Google insane growth strategy at Stanford graduation ceremony. Another bad example I didn’t expect was when you search Yahoo for Google, they have something like this:

if(query == “google”){
echo “Are you trying to search the web. Try Yahoo”
}

Special search box if and only if you search for Google. They removed it eventually.

2- In most cases, you can export your data and go somewhere else, just like Eric promised. So they don’t lock the customer.

Now, as for the dark side of the Google force, I think it will only be revealed when you start doing business with them. Adsense can be very successful, or not based on your site content and traffic. Most people writing about adsense sucks are probably disappointed bloggers, as with blogs I see it doesn’t perform well unless you are writing about hot topic with hot ads. People click on travel, celebrity ads more than they click on New web editor ad for example. But that’s bad performance not evil spirit.

What I came to see as really unfair is how Google judge and punish AdSense publishers for fraud clicks that come from their site. Maybe I could do it once or twice to get $0.5 from my site, but a whole flood of clicks is a definite attack on me no way I would want this to happen. Google immediately would send termination notification for you and you can only appeal once, many times the appeal is denied.

As I am not the one providing the service, Google should handle the fraud clicks and all. But for small startups, Google overlooks them and see the best way is to close their account. If this is legitimate, then I guess it would be logic any click fraud on Google it self should cause Google Ads to go away for good and knock them out of business. I also don’t think they would do it for large accounts like YouTube now for example.

I’ve read some stories about banning accounts and they are terrible. Makes you inconfident to build business case around it.

(Did you notice this should go as a new post!)

Leave a comment