<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google fixes Chrome vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogallalong.com/2008/09/08/google-fixes-chrome-vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogallalong.com/2008/09/08/google-fixes-chrome-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description>News and articles about technology, computers, internet, search engines, books, video games, movies and documentaries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bashar</title>
		<link>http://blogallalong.com/2008/09/08/google-fixes-chrome-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-19878</link>
		<dc:creator>Bashar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogallalong.com/?p=644#comment-19878</guid>
		<description>Ali: Really. I thought you changed the site layout there :P

Whats special is: Speed, especially because they compile javascript to machine code rather than interpret it every time.

Process per tab: Should make it more efficient on the long run.

No unneeded bars. If you notice, many parts of regular browser are hidden but when needed. Use it for intensive sites and you should feel the difference. At least I would guess so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ali: Really. I thought you changed the site layout there :P</p>
<p>Whats special is: Speed, especially because they compile javascript to machine code rather than interpret it every time.</p>
<p>Process per tab: Should make it more efficient on the long run.</p>
<p>No unneeded bars. If you notice, many parts of regular browser are hidden but when needed. Use it for intensive sites and you should feel the difference. At least I would guess so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://blogallalong.com/2008/09/08/google-fixes-chrome-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-19871</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogallalong.com/?p=644#comment-19871</guid>
		<description>I tried Chrome very briefly, couldn&#039;t see what&#039;s special about it, I may need to use it a bit more I guess. It seems that I reads CSS more like IE than Firefox, which is screwed up of course when displaying my blog lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Chrome very briefly, couldn&#8217;t see what&#8217;s special about it, I may need to use it a bit more I guess. It seems that I reads CSS more like IE than Firefox, which is screwed up of course when displaying my blog lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
