<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, a possible good YouTube revenue model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/</link>
	<description>News and articles about technology, computers, internet, search engines, books, video games, movies and documentaries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bashar</title>
		<link>http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-51897</link>
		<dc:creator>Bashar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/#comment-51897</guid>
		<description>MBH: You know I personally don&#039;t mind it, but I find out other people do. But if their concern is the user, then I wonder how they thought the overlapping ad is more convenient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MBH: You know I personally don&#8217;t mind it, but I find out other people do. But if their concern is the user, then I wonder how they thought the overlapping ad is more convenient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-51896</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/#comment-51896</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t understand why they won&#039;t enable ads within the videos themselves. Short ads (5 seconds tops).

People are tolerating 5-10 minute videos, so buffering 5 extra seconds won&#039;t harm.

The ad itself doesn&#039;t have to be a video. It can be a still picture shown for 5 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#8217;t understand why they won&#8217;t enable ads within the videos themselves. Short ads (5 seconds tops).</p>
<p>People are tolerating 5-10 minute videos, so buffering 5 extra seconds won&#8217;t harm.</p>
<p>The ad itself doesn&#8217;t have to be a video. It can be a still picture shown for 5 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finally, a possible good YouTube revenue model</title>
		<link>http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-51893</link>
		<dc:creator>Finally, a possible good YouTube revenue model</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogallalong.com/2009/10/04/finally-a-possible-good-youtube-revenue-model/#comment-51893</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original: Finally, a possible good YouTube revenue model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original: Finally, a possible good YouTube revenue model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

