BlogAllAlong » Advertisement

Google To Acquire AdMob

Bashar — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:34:03 +0000

Google to Acquire AdMob

November 2009

Today we announced that AdMob has signed a definitive agreement to be acquired by Google for $750 million. We are extremely excited about this new partnership and what it means for our publishers.

AdMob’s people, products and tools will continue to work to effectively monetize your mobile traffic – no interruptions. Our product and engineering teams will keep building great products for our customers. Our sales team will keep working with our thousands of advertisers to deliver successful campaigns.

After our deal closes, AdMob will work with Google to accelerate the pace of innovation in mobile and do an even better job for you. We believe this deal will benefit our developer and publisher partners by:

*Building even more powerful technology and tools to monetize mobile traffic.

*Increasing the effectiveness of display advertising on mobile devices by leveraging Google sales team, infrastructure and relationships.

*Improving the already high level of service and support we deliver to our publishers.

You can read more about this deal at www.admob.com/google.

Omar

AdMob is the leading mobile advertising marketplace out there, and mobile advertisement is something that Google have been wanting to get into heavily for quite sometime. Having tried it for a very short time I wasn’t very impressed with the relevancy of the ads that I stopped looking at it. But if Google’s got their hands on it, I think we better keep our eyes open.

Still though, the problem with mobile advertisement is the conversion rate on the advertiser site. How many ways and on how many mobile phones can an advertiser profit from a mobile visit? Not many yet. Thanks to the iPhone however, things are changing to the better.

Damn Smartly Genius NIKE Campaign!

Bashar — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:19:22 +0000

Sport challenge campaign by Nike between the two mortal enemies bound to live together for as long as the human race continues. Men & Women. Who runs more? I’m glad to say so far we’re doing great. The campaign Nikeplus (make sure to watch the ad there) is to promote the new set of iPod accessories from Nike. See the video below for more about the gadgets.

Google Embeds Ads in Image Search

Bashar — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:49:55 +0000

Today I noticed that Google have started introducing Sponsored Ads on top of their image results page. Right now if I try several searches again however, for some reason it doesn’t show up. Was it just a small testing period? Maybe. The ads anyways don’t ruin the page look and usability to an annoying level. Click Image below to see big view of it.

Question now is whether text ads will have good conversion when user is searching for images.

Let me know if you also see it, and what you think of it.

This is how Japanese advertise Google Chrome

Bashar — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:50:55 +0000

via JayAre

Google new type of ads?

Bashar — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:08:09 +0000

I’m not sure if this is new to me or new to Google them selves, but those new Google AdSense Image ads really look more attractive than before.

Anybody know about this?

UPDATE: It turns out this is a new type of ad being tested by Google, where you select a template of animated or photo gallery ad, select title, logo, and collection of photos to get going. I got the option once, got an error when I wanted to finalize the ad, and now, the option is gone :(. I want it back!

Google Ads on Yahoo Search Pages Almost A Reality

Bashar — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:47:48 +0000

I left the soccer pitch yesterday 11 PM to see an SMS forward from a friend about TechCrunch Twitter alert, Yahoo-Google announcement 1:30 PM today. This is gotta be about the advertising partnership.

And indeed, I woke up today to read about the Google & Yahoo public joint announcement declaring they are going into an advertisement partnership in which Google Ads will be served on Yahoo search results for the queries Yahoo! see as rewarding for them. So Yahoo! is not giving up completely on their advertising program, but if the estimates of $800 million revenue increase in one year turns out to be true, and my senses tell it’s going to be more, I guess they could change their mind about the partial partnership.

The Justice Department ofcourse is still unhappy and are investigating a possible AntiTrust. However, since Yahoo played it smart, and made a non-exclusive advertisement partnership agreement, which means any other bidders may get theirs ads on Yahoo pages as well, then I guess there is no reason for the partnership to be stopped.

How this will affect advertisers is what makes me wonder however. Yahoo! can select the queries it want to have Google Ads for, and stick to their program for others. So how will this happen, for keyword “shopping” for example. There are two sides here:

- I am a Google Advertiser: Will I have the option to show my ads on Yahoo! search results. This could make sense to avoid possible lawsuits, or it could under the Content Network. If it’s an opt-in, the adaptation rate might be a bit slower. Not everyone is always up to date on those changes. Otherwise, it may be an opt-out option, and I doubt people want to do this really.

- I am a Yahoo! Advertiser: I am bidding for the word shopping. Does Yahoo! tell me “Sorry, go join Google and bid for Shopping word”? What if I don’t want to place my ads on Google because of say, click-fraud cases I’ve heard of. And what if not all my words are powered by Google Ads. It means I have to literally manage two advertising programs, who are mutually exclusive in the budget and tracking, to bid for the keywords I want.

I just hope there will be a bit more easier way to do it, and a sort of integration between the two.

Soon your Google Ads may showup on Yahoo!

Bashar — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:16:55 +0000

Google and Yahoo! have been undergoing a testing period for the efficiency of delivering Google Ads alongside Yahoo search results. This is to measure how the ad click-throughs are compared to Yahoo’s own ads. Yahoo themselves estimate that Google Ads bring 60-70% more revenue than Yahoo. This is because of ad relevancy for one, and two I’m sure from the large collection of advertisers Google has. The more options you have, the more possible it is to deliver better results. Also, the user won’t get bored from the same results all the time. And when it comes to global market, say the Arabic region for example, or any other non-English site, it’s pretty difficult to get any geo-targeted ads. I don’t see any Arabic ads at Yahoo or any other ad network, while Google is getting more and more every day.

The test was to show Google ads at 3% of Yahoo search results inside the US for two weeks only. How did it go? Both parties have spoken general good deal of it so far. The Justice Department have been officially informed about the ongoing tests, and questions are rising right now about whether a deal between the two would give Google a monopoly over the internet ad market. Frankly, I would love for my Google Ads to show on Yahoo results for two reasons. One, Google is the best advertising program I’ve tried from many others, and gives very strong ad control and tracking. Two, I don’t want to split my money and time following multiple ad programs. Still however, for a multi-billion dollar business that large, I believe Google are over looking certain areas and need to improve on them:

Ad Filtering: Filter unwanted ads on my site. Sex & gambling mainly. Google does a brilliant job catching fraud ads, ads that do not reflect the site content, heck they even ban certain Arabic words if they are about medical terms without valid permit. I’ve had one keyword disabled “عقار” which means both real-estate and medicine. It was banned because it’s a medical term and I can’t promote medical stuff without any proof of permit, even if I really meant real estate. So their filtering is strong when they want to, yet their Google AdSense competitive ad filtering is pretty lousy. I filter a certain site and after 12 hours I can still see the ads showing up on my site. This could be really embarrassing and bad for a business. I also don’t get any chance to disallow gambling and sex sites, which I believe should be a normal easy to implement option. Google already offers to filter offensive content in it’s search, so an option to disallow those sites from advertising on mine should be pretty simple.
Customer Support: How easy is it to contact Google for support? And how long does it take for them to reply. Not what you hope for from a leading company. Google support has always been disappointing to me.
Wire-Transfer: For AdSense, most countries are still not supported for money transfer. Many smaller sites are ahead of Google and transfer to any place in the world. Google is only slowly expanding, and yet promoting the green environment thing.
Money Split: For some reason Google just don’t wish to tell you how much your share is from the click. Many other sites do. The ad is on my site and we are sharing the revenue. Any business would usually include share percentage. Google always gives vague unclear answers about the subject. If it’s bad, then you’re doing EVIL. If it’s good, then say it. One report was published before by New York Times based on announced 2006 Google financial reports estimating 78.5% of the AdSense clicks going to the publishers. Such a big number makes you wonder why wouldn’t Google reveal it. One reason I can think of is maybe they don’t want competitors to know the percentage and start a percentage share war.

All in all, Google remains a very strong source for advertising and revenue that I would like to see expand further. A bit more attention is required hoewever for customer needs.

Google Testing Scroll Ads

Bashar — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:10:33 +0000

I’ve noticed this today on Q8igg. Google seems to be testing new type of ads with up/down arrows to dynamically display more ads.

Circled is the scroll arrow for up/down

Transitioning from one group ads to another

New ads shown

While I don’t think so many people in general would go and browse for more ads, it certainly doesn’t harm at all and could become useful in some situations. Sometimes when the site is really focused on one topic, and ads are so relevant, I do tend to refresh or go back to see some certain ads. So browsing for more would come in handy as well.

Speaking of Google by the way, it could be a good time to invest in it after it’s recent strong share drop suffering the lower than expected end of year report, and the recent Microsoft record bid (twice as large as current largest) to acquire Yahoo.

Is rounded corner Google Ads fair?

Bashar — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:54:07 +0000

Google Ads come with different size and shapes. One of them, which appeal to me the most, happen to be the very rounded corner ones. Google are very careful and enforce many constraints on the ads, do many changed and monitoring to protect the advertiser from invalid clicks, and do their best to increase the quality of the click for the both the advertiser and end user. Since it’s release I’ve been having doubts about the very rounded corner ads. If you take a look at the sample below, which a snapshot of a real ad.

Notice something? The very rounded corner ads don’t come with the display url of the site. What that means is, before the user clicks he has absolutely no idea where he will end up, and after clicking, he may just end up at the same site he clicked before. If he have seen the URL before, perhaps he would’ve not wanted to click the ad at all. For him, it was a waste of time, and for the advertiser, it was a kind of waste for his money as well. This personally happens a lot to me. I see ads similar to previous ones that interest me, but I’m not sure if I will get to the same site or not. Moving the mouse over the link ofcourse does not show the real address. Sometimes out of sympathy to the advertiser, I just copy the whole lengthy ad url and fetch the domain name to see if it’s the same or not. The example shown above is a perfect example (I somehow got it when I wanted to write the post… Lucky!). Reading both ads reveal almost the same site, however it can’t be as they are showing next to each other. Which one would I click? And if one of the ads show up again later, should I click it? I don’t know if I visited the site before or not.

I know the rounded corner eats some space, but I just wish even snippet of the URL would be shown to give the user small hint. This would increase the value of the click I believe. What do you guys think?

Testing new Amazon widgets

Bashar — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:01:41 +0000

I am playing with some new Amazon Associates widgets that I came across today. These are the new ones to me:

Unbox Video: Lists some videos to play from. Nice feature, but it’s too wide to fit into a blog, and there isn’t large variety of videos. For example, I chose documentaries and biographies, but ended up having only movie films showing. Why? Simply, no variety or it’s still buggy. Both ways I can’t risk showing any type of video on my site.
Slideshow: I love this kind of interactive ad. You can fade in from one item to another. Again, minimum size is 336×280. Not suitable for a blog.
Product Cloud: The typical cloud of words, bigger is most popular. I don’t like that type of ad very much.
My Favorites: This is what I used to list down another list of What I’m Reading. So far, I prefer the old links as they are faster to load and take less space. What do you think?
Wish List: If you want everyone to know your wish list. Not that it’s very different than my Favorite list, but I just don’t feel like letting people in. Ofcourse my wife sneaks on my list from my PC I can do nothing about it :(.
Quick Linker: This might be interesting for some. Installing the widget on your blog/site will enable you to use custom HTML tags for quick associate linking to Amazon like this:
- Harry Potter</a> –> Links to Amazon.com search results page for “Harry Potter”
- My favorite hero</a> –> The link reads “My favorite hero” and points to a search results page for the phrase”Harry Potter”.

Search: On the fly AJAX based search results. Width can fit sidebar of a blog.

As to how is the overall experience with Amazon conversions? Not so great at all. I just have it there become it doesn’t harm for one, plus I want to list my recommended items and guide the site visitors to buying it. What do you think?

New interactive Google Gadget Ad Formt on the way

Bashar — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:47:06 +0000

Seoz have reported on his blog about the new type of interactive Ad format that is coming from Google. The new type of ads, still in Beta, will open the door to advertisers to interact with their customers through rich media capabilities that supports real data feed, images, videos and more, all in on single ad unit that can be built using Flash, HTML, or combination of both. Here is a sample of the Honda ad unit:

The reported initial impression from early testers, like Pepsi-Cola and Honda are so far positive. I can only think of the endless possibilities this type of ads will open. What’s great about it is that it’s unlike the conventional type of ads which the user tends to avoid. A useful gadget in a catchy design would get you more sticky users. I cannot wait to read more on this.

To read more about the gadgets click here. Alas, most Adwords users are still not eligible for the service.

Smart telecom ad from Pixar

Bashar — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:10:24 +0000

Only once I was not shocked by PIXAR product, and this was when they released the Toy Story sequel only. I have seen all their movies and every time you see one you say “This is the top!”. Next movie proves you were wrong. What I love about this company is their patience and determination to bring something totally new every time. Just like Walt Disney used to be in the old days. Their start was with 3D animated commercials for outside companies. This is one of the ads they produced for a telecom service. Not sure when or who came up with idea, but the implementation is lovely. And it’s definitely a lot better than the classical ads we see.

Google tests new type of ads?

Bashar — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:41:47 +0000

I’ve noticed this today on Q8Ba7th site. Google Sponsored Ads are showing extra links at the bottom. But what are they? I thought first I have screwed up somewhere but figured no. This seems like new type of ads by Google with extra links at bottom. You click on one of the links, say Photo Blog and the ads will change accordingly to that type. It does not really look compelling to me, but what it gives is broader exposure of ads to the publisher and end user. End of the line, t could streamline some more income. How do we measure it? I need to make sure first this thing is permanent as I only saw it once up till now. Then we need to examine the revenue growth if there is any.

Have any of you noticed this kind of ads as well?

How Strange BidVertiser Behaves!

Bashar — Tue, 08 May 2007 11:40:05 +0000

Every now and then I think about trying alternatives to what I use. As for online ads, it’s always been Google Ads. When I tried others, I found out they all have higher minimum Cost Per Click, and I even tried Microsoft Ad Center, which after completing the sign-up process took me back to the first page to sign-up again! With some services you can accept minor bugs and glitches. But when you are putting your money and business on the line, you need to trust how accurate this system will calculate the cost, and how efficient and flexible it is. How much you can rely on it. With BidVertiser, this is my story:

I signed up few months back to give it a shot. For some reason I did not use their service back then, probably because of high minimum cost-per-click or high minimum daily budget. Right now it seems their minimum CPC is down to $0.01, so that’s good. Anyways, I stopped there last time and since then they kept chasing me with promotional offers via email. Today I got a $20 FREE credit to use, so I said what the heck? I will use it anyways, and then decide if the service is worth investment. They somehow allowed themselves to send me the username and password in clear. Makes you wonder how secured your balance is. Anyhow, I still wanted to use the FREE gift, but upon trying to sign-in, I got invalid username/password provided! But HOW? I copied and pasted the same username/password and still the same thing! OK, I will use Forgot Password instead. Providing my email address I got this nice sorry message:

“Sorry, but the E-mail address you specified, “***@gmail.com” is not associated with any Advertiser account.”

How on earth can you be sending me promotional emails with my username/password and then say I don’t have any advertiser account! This is when you should walk away from the service, and never turn back. But before, let’s unsubscribe from their service so I don’t keep receiving their emails.

Ooops…

“If you wish to unsubscribe from the Publisher Email Notifications, simply login to your account and choose to unsubscribe under “Account Management -> Edit Profile”.

I have to be signed-in to unsubscribe. But I can’t sign-in since I’m not registered, yet I do receive emails because I did register. Or perhaps I didn’t! Confusing hah! So now what? Simply click Report Spam and that’s it for little BidVertiser.

Google Pulls DoubleClick Infront Of Microsoft’s Eyes

Bashar — Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:10:36 +0000

Competition is healthy they say. You know why? The $2 billion price tagged DoubleClick has ended up in a $3.1 billion Google deal, leaving Microsoft out of luck, and once again, Google beats Microsoft and dominates the internet advertisement. Some people argued the $2 billion is overpriced. How about $3.1 billion now. Perhaps the company it self is not worth that amount, but for Google, it’s about prosperity, and losing it to Microsoft is a double loss. Bill Gates had this concept when he war running everything in Microsoft. The way he looks at it is, if you lose a $100 K deal, you actually lost $200 K. The $100 K deal it self, and the other $100 K deal your competitor is going to make. And in Google case, it’s about keeping their ground, which they did.

Google Ads Now Per Action

Bashar — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:57:18 +0000

This is BIG news. Google Ads advertisers can now pay-per-action only. Means you will only pay when the customer clicks the ad, go to your site and perform certain action, like fill up a form, signup or click a lead. The feature, since not per click, will allow publisher to post ads that will appear as normal text links. The cost however logically will be higher, minimum of $1 as it seems from Google. One good thing about it if it become the normal ad trend is that it will kill the click-fraud, which is the biggest headache for Google. Read more about it on SearchEngineJournal.

Why Google Adwords is still the best

Bashar — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:15:18 +0000

When ever someone is talking about online ads, he is probably talking about Google Adwords. The widest exposure you can get is by joining the mostly used search engine world wide. But why only stick to one place for ads? Doesn’t that mean you are loosing other potential customers? I have had this thought my self and went into exploring it a bit. The two other candidates I found with good reviews are Yahoo! and AdBrite.

Yahoo, in the beginning seemed like a good candidate for ads. It’s signup page was not obvious, they simply have many advertising programs. Once you find it, signing up seemed pretty simple and the ads are pretty easy to setup. You can get expert help for a fee as well (I wouldn’t recommend it though). The first drawback was that it’s still limited to US and Canada only! Means if you have your target customers in Europe or Middle-East for instance then you’re out of luck. The other thing that stopped me was the minimum Cost-Per-Click. While Google gives you the flexibility to chose as low as 1 cent, Yahoo restricts it to minimum of $0.1. For someone who has a great turn-over in profit this might be feasible, but if you consider your sale to be $2 for instance, this means you have to get a lead out of every 20 persons only. Not easy to get always. Other than that, feeding in the keywords you can get quick suggestions and estimated traffic for the keywords. It seemed pretty good and convenient. If this pricing and market segment meets your needs, I think it would be worth it to invest part of your ads on Yahoo.

My other option was AdBrite. However I was more frustrated with this one, as my minimum daily budget has to be $5. That means minimum $150/month/ That’s not so cheap if you are just starting your own personal business and not sure how successful it will be. As Yahoo is a bigger brand, starting up and we expect to see it grow over the next few years, between the two I would suggest Yahoo they still give more flexibility, if you need a second ads channel that is. Starting point still looks Google Adwords to me.

BlogAllAlong » Advertisement

Google To Acquire AdMob

Related Posts:

Damn Smartly Genius NIKE Campaign!

Related Posts:

Google Embeds Ads in Image Search

Related Posts:

This is how Japanese advertise Google Chrome

Related Posts:

Google new type of ads?

Related Posts:

Google Ads on Yahoo Search Pages Almost A Reality

Most Popular Posts:

Soon your Google Ads may showup on Yahoo!

Most Popular Posts:

Google Testing Scroll Ads

Most Popular Posts:

Is rounded corner Google Ads fair?

Most Popular Posts:

Testing new Amazon widgets

Most Popular Posts:

New interactive Google Gadget Ad Formt on the way

Most Popular Posts:

Smart telecom ad from Pixar

Most Popular Posts:

Google tests new type of ads?

Most Popular Posts:

How Strange BidVertiser Behaves!

Most Popular Posts:

Google Pulls DoubleClick Infront Of Microsoft’s Eyes

Most Popular Posts:

Google Ads Now Per Action

Most Popular Posts:

Why Google Adwords is still the best

Most Popular Posts: